For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a pal - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a couple of easy triggers about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of writing, however it's also a bit recurring, wiki.vifm.info and extremely verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's prompts in collecting information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a strange, repeated hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, since pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can buy any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody creating one in anyone's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, created by AI, and created "solely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, but Mr Mashiach worries that the product is planned as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get sold even more.

He wishes to expand his range, generating different genres such as sci-fi, and possibly providing an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we actually imply human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for imaginative functions ought to be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without consent ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely powerful however let's construct it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually chosen to block AI designers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to utilize developers' content on the internet to assist establish their designs, unless the rights pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also strongly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and an entire lot of delight," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its finest performing industries on the unclear guarantee of development."

A government representative said: "No relocation will be made till we are definitely confident we have a practical strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to assist them accredit their material, access to top quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a national data library including public data from a wide range of sources will also be made available to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the security of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a number of lawsuits against AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their approval, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of elements which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training data and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became the many downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the moment, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has lots of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to read in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But given how rapidly the tech is progressing, I'm unsure for how long I can remain positive that my considerably slower human writing and yewiki.org modifying abilities, are much better.

Register for drapia.org our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.