For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a pal - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me provided by my pal Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and very amusing in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of composing, however it's likewise a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's triggers in collecting data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, since rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can buy any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in anybody's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, developed by AI, trademarketclassifieds.com and developed "solely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is planned as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He wishes to broaden his range, creating different categories such as sci-fi, and possibly using an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, shiapedia.1god.org like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are discussing data here, we in fact indicate human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for creative purposes need to be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without permission ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely effective but let's develop it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have chosen to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to use creators' material on the internet to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also strongly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of joy," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its best carrying out markets on the vague guarantee of growth."

A federal government representative said: "No move will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a useful plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to assist them license their material, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a national data library including public data from a broad range of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the safety of AI with, amongst other things, firms in the sector annunciogratis.net needed to share details of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to want the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a number of suits versus AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their permission, wiki.whenparked.com and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of factors which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training information and whether it must be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became the many downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It has lots of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite challenging to read in parts since it's so long-winded.

But offered how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm unsure the length of time I can stay positive that my significantly slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.