For Christmas I got an interesting present from a friend - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a few simple prompts about me supplied by my pal Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of writing, but it's also a bit recurring, and very verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's prompts in looking at data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repeated hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, because pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can order any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody creating one in any person's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, produced by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and joy".

Legally, surgiteams.com the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the product is meant as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get sold even more.

He wishes to broaden his variety, creating different categories such as sci-fi, sitiosecuador.com and maybe providing an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - selling AI-generated items to human customers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, annunciogratis.net certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, forum.altaycoins.com authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we actually suggest human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to nominate it for wiki.whenparked.com a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still .

"I do not believe using generative AI for innovative purposes ought to be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without approval ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be very powerful however let's build it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have chosen to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to use developers' content on the web to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also strongly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of joy," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its finest performing markets on the unclear promise of growth."

A federal government spokesperson said: "No move will be made until we are definitely confident we have a useful plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to help them accredit their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide information library consisting of public data from a large range of sources will likewise be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the security of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector required to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to want the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a number of claims against AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their authorization, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of elements which can constitute fair use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training information and whether it should be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a portion of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has lots of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But provided how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm not exactly sure how long I can remain positive that my significantly slower human writing and modifying skills, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC reporters all over the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.