Our new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

Nobody can anticipate the future but at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to provide it its best shot. With as much as date news and a little but feisty 14 Billion specification design, our AI is boldly forecasting the unforeseeable. Join us as we try to respond to humankind's hardest questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as two years ago, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain many pushing questions that are less easy to select. Our company, Lightning arrester Labs, has been mining questions from locations like polymarket.com and training a big language model to be better at forecasting the future (and have actually seen some intriguing enhancements - term paper inbound). This week we turned its cold, determining eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can give us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world sign up for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion criterion model which is in fact on the smaller sized side. (Some estimates suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION parameters and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from lots of months back so we have actually built an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we offer the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unidentified territory to make its best forecast possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We positioned the following questions to our AI and evaluated its reaction. While we have seen forecast enhancements from our training, utilize these estimates for prop wagering at your own peril.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% chance

Therefore it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI thinks Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, but a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta factor in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposal ...

First, I'll look at the bottom lines from the articles. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor considering that 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been encouraging of his profession, attending his games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and e.bike.free.fr Taylor has actually even invited her family and friends to the Super Bowl, revealing her commitment.

Some fans are thrilled, while others, specifically Swifties, are a bit uncertain, especially offered remarks Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has actually caused some Swifties to question how suitable Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship private and not attending to the speculation straight.

I think the bottom lines are the speculation and his evasive answers. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is a crucial event, the odds and his actions recommend it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd approximate a low probability, perhaps around 5%, considering all elements.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the incredibly bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% opportunity

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" move, now its simply a different front-tush being pushed. Will an AI understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's comparable efforts? Appears like our AI believes they'll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this video game.

Alright, I'm attempting to figure out the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I need to understand what exactly a "tush-push" is. From the short articles, it looks like it's a technique where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to push off protectors. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that requires strength and technique.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the move. The short article mentions that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this technique, which is quite high. ... I also need to think of the protective strategies of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs know the Eagles' "tush-push" technique, they might adjust their defense appropriately, which could either increase or reduce the variety of times the Eagles utilize it.

Considering that more than 5 looks like a significant number but possible offered their self-confidence, I would approximate a likelihood around 60-70% chance. This accounts for their preparation, self-confidence in the method, and the possibility that they'll use it a number of times, especially if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime show efficiency?

AI Final Prediction: 65% possibility

While our AI might not resemble us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was quite uncertain, waffling back and forth, but in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to back down from a fight.

From the articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement during a previous halftime program when Trump existed in 2018. That seems considerable due to the fact that it reveals he's done it before, so maybe he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more recent articles, it discusses that Lamar is moving far from political statements and focusing more on personal expression. That could suggest he's less likely to address Trump this time.

However, he's likewise associated with a feud with Drake, which might provide him reasons to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal concerns surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a disparagement match from Drake, so perhaps he's cautious about consisting of any questionable songs in the efficiency. But considering that he won the Grammys for that track, he may still want to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent event, library.kemu.ac.ke Lamar might feel forced to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to prevent political declarations throughout the halftime program, parentingliteracy.com so there's a threat that such content may be restricted or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making strong carry on huge phases. He's the first solo rap act to heading the halftime show, which may offer him more imaginative freedom. Plus, his past behavior suggests he's not shy about expressing his viewpoints, even in public efficiencies.

But I also keep in mind reading that Lamar revealed tiredness about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could show he's less motivated to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's concentrating on his feud with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, existing shifts in focus, legal issues, and the occasion's context-the possibility seems to be moderately high, maybe around 65%.

Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the incredibly bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% opportunity

Lets be truthful, Andy Reid likes cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the reality that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its prediction? Appears like theres somewhat of a possibility that if the chiefs taste success, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the short articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't indicate to trigger offense and that he really found it humorous himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which might suggest he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.

Taking a look at the short articles, qoocle.com it points out that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and likes cheeseburgers. There's a post particularly about his love for food, which recommends that he's an individual who delights in eating, specifically with his team. So, if there were plans to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, especially if the situation is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% opportunity

"Tails never fails?" You can't trick the makers !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been forecasting the coin toss and 53% are forecasting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 incredibly bowls. Potentially lucrative? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be fooled and believes anything can happen when that coin enters the air.

Okay, so I'm trying to determine the probability that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, however there's some historic information that may influence this prediction.

First, I check out the posts supplied. They all discuss the historic data of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has turned up regularly than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the outcome 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a small edge, however it's not a huge distinction.

However, I bear in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is typically thought about random. The small historic edge for tails could be due to opportunity. But when making predictions, often individuals weigh historic information even if it's not statistically considerable. So, I need to consider whether this historic predisposition ought to influence the possibility.

After thinking of it, I decide that while the historical information shows a slight preference for tails, it's not statistically significant sufficient to move the probability far from 0.5. So, I'll choose 0.5 as the likelihood, acknowledging that the slight historic edge exists but doesn't override the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% opportunity

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na help him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would most likely think the same. BUT, its official now because our AI states the opportunities are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still type of high when it pertains to scams on a nationwide scale). Looks like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the likelihood that the referees will cheat to help the the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a pretty serious allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of short articles that discuss conspiracy theories recommending referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some questionable employ current video games, specifically the AFC National championship. That does seem to stimulate some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get irritated when their group loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "unbelievable" and "ridiculous." They say there's no proof of methodical bias. That's a strong statement from the people in charge. If they're denying it, it may imply there's no real basis or they would have resolved it differently if there was some reality to it.

Taking a look at the posts, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise discussed that analytical analysis doesn't reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For circumstances, Mike Pereira from FOX said data reveals the Chiefs have actually been penalized more since 2022. That's interesting since if they were getting unique treatment, you might anticipate less charges, right?

...

So, putting everything together, the likelihood that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably extremely low. Maybe not zero since you can't rule out every possibility, however very not likely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth seeing the game still? I think I'll have to wait and see how the game ends up before we release this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a good game! And hello, if it turns out our AI was wrong about everything, a minimum of it can gain from this.