U.S. Foreign Policy
Since its founding in 1922, Foreign Affairs has actually been the leading online forum for serious conversation of American foreign policy and international affairs. The magazine has actually included contributions from numerous leading international affairs specialists.

More Resources

- Feedback
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Gift a Subscription
- About Us
- Events
- Issue Archive
- Advertise
- Audio Content
- Account Management
- FAQs
Spy vs. AI

ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior operational roles in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, including as its very first Chief Risk Officer.

- More by Anne Neuberger
Spy vs. AI

How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage

Anne Neuberger

-.
Copy Link Copied. Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-ai. Copy


Gift Link Copied. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Sign in.


Create Citation Copied. Chicago MLA APSA APA. Chicago Cite not available at the moment. MLA Cite not available at the moment. APSA Cite not available at the moment. APA Cite not available at the moment


Download PDF. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Sign in.


Request Reprint. Request reprint consents here.




In the early 1950s, the United States faced a vital intelligence obstacle in its growing competitors with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance photos from The second world war could no longer supply adequate intelligence about Soviet military capabilities, and existing U.S. monitoring abilities were no longer able to penetrate the Soviet Union's closed airspace. This shortage spurred an adventurous moonshot initiative: the advancement of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In just a couple of years, U-2 objectives were delivering important intelligence, capturing pictures of Soviet rocket installations in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.

Today, the United States stands at a comparable point. Competition between Washington and its competitors over the future of the international order is intensifying, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States should take benefit of its first-rate private sector and sufficient capability for innovation to outcompete its foes. The U.S. intelligence community need to harness the country's sources of strength to deliver insights to policymakers at the speed of today's world. The integration of synthetic intelligence, particularly through big language designs, offers groundbreaking opportunities to improve intelligence operations and analysis, allowing the shipment of faster and more relevant assistance to decisionmakers. This technological transformation features significant downsides, however, specifically as adversaries exploit comparable developments to reveal and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States should challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, initially to secure itself from enemies who may use the technology for ill, and first to use AI in line with the laws and values of a democracy.

For the U.S. national security neighborhood, fulfilling the guarantee and managing the danger of AI will need deep technological and cultural modifications and a desire to change the way agencies work. The U.S. intelligence and military neighborhoods can harness the potential of AI while reducing its intrinsic threats, making sure that the United States maintains its one-upmanship in a quickly progressing international landscape. Even as it does so, the United States need to transparently convey to the American public, and to populations and partners worldwide, how the nation means to fairly and safely utilize AI, in compliance with its laws and values.

MORE, sitiosecuador.com BETTER, FASTER

AI's capacity to reinvent the intelligence community depends on its ability to procedure and analyze vast quantities of information at unmatched speeds. It can be challenging to evaluate big quantities of collected data to create time-sensitive cautions. U.S. intelligence services might take advantage of AI systems' pattern recognition abilities to recognize and alert human analysts to possible hazards, such as missile launches or military movements, or important international advancements that analysts understand senior U.S. decisionmakers are interested in. This capability would make sure that crucial cautions are timely, actionable, and pertinent, enabling more efficient responses to both rapidly emerging hazards and emerging policy chances. Multimodal designs, which incorporate text, images, and audio, improve this analysis. For circumstances, utilizing AI to cross-reference satellite images with signals intelligence could offer a detailed view of military movements, allowing quicker and more accurate hazard evaluations and possibly brand-new means of providing details to policymakers.

Intelligence analysts can also unload recurring and time-consuming tasks to devices to focus on the most fulfilling work: generating initial and much deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence community's general insights and performance. An excellent example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence agencies invested early in AI-powered capabilities, and the bet has actually paid off. The abilities of language designs have actually grown increasingly sophisticated and accurate-OpenAI's recently launched o1 and o3 designs showed considerable progress in precision and thinking ability-and can be utilized to much more rapidly translate and summarize text, audio, and video files.

Although challenges remain, future systems trained on higher quantities of non-English data could be efficient in critical subtle differences in between dialects and understanding the meaning and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By depending on these tools, the intelligence neighborhood might concentrate on training a cadre of highly specialized linguists, who can be tough to find, typically battle to get through the clearance process, and take a very long time to train. And of course, by making more foreign language products available throughout the best firms, U.S. intelligence services would be able to faster triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they receive to select out the needles in the haystack that actually matter.

The worth of such speed to policymakers can not be underestimated. Models can swiftly sift through intelligence data sets, open-source details, and conventional human intelligence and produce draft summaries or preliminary analytical reports that experts can then verify and improve, guaranteeing the end products are both detailed and accurate. Analysts might coordinate with an advanced AI assistant to resolve analytical issues, test concepts, and brainstorm in a collective fashion, improving each version of their analyses and providing finished intelligence more quickly.

Consider Israel's experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, covertly broke into a secret Iranian facility and stole about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran's nuclear activities in between 1999 and wiki.monnaie-libre.fr 2003. According to Israeli authorities, the Mossad collected some 55,000 pages of documents and a further 55,000 files kept on CDs, consisting of photos and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior authorities put immense pressure on intelligence professionals to produce detailed evaluations of its material and whether it indicated a continuous effort to build an Iranian bomb. But it took these experts several months-and numerous hours of labor-to equate each page, review it by hand for pertinent material, and incorporate that details into assessments. With today's AI capabilities, the very first 2 steps in that procedure might have been accomplished within days, perhaps even hours, enabling experts to understand and contextualize the intelligence quickly.

Among the most interesting applications is the way AI might transform how intelligence is taken in by policymakers, enabling them to communicate straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such abilities would enable users to ask specific concerns and get summed up, relevant details from thousands of reports with source citations, helping them make informed decisions rapidly.

BRAVE NEW WORLD

Although AI uses various advantages, it also presents significant brand-new risks, particularly as foes establish comparable technologies. China's advancements in AI, especially in computer vision and monitoring, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the nation is ruled by an authoritarian routine, it does not have personal privacy constraints and civil liberty protections. That deficit makes it possible for large-scale data collection practices that have yielded information sets of enormous size. Government-sanctioned AI designs are trained on vast quantities of individual and behavioral data that can then be utilized for different functions, such as surveillance and social control. The presence of Chinese companies, such as Huawei, in telecommunications systems and software application worldwide could provide China with ready access to bulk data, notably bulk images that can be utilized to train facial recognition models, a particular concern in nations with large U.S. military bases. The U.S. nationwide security neighborhood must think about how Chinese models developed on such extensive data sets can give China a strategic benefit.

And it is not simply China. The expansion of "open source" AI models, such as Meta's Llama and those produced by the French business Mistral AI and the Chinese business DeepSeek, is putting powerful AI capabilities into the hands of users around the world at fairly budget friendly expenses. Much of these users are benign, however some are not-including authoritarian regimes, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign stars are using large language designs to rapidly produce and spread out incorrect and destructive content or to conduct cyberattacks. As witnessed with other intelligence-related innovations, such as signals intercept capabilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, and Russia will have every incentive to share some of their AI advancements with customer states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary company, thereby increasing the threat to the United States and its allies.

The U.S. military and intelligence neighborhood's AI models will become attractive targets for enemies. As they grow more and main to U.S. nationwide security decision-making, intelligence AIs will end up being important national possessions that should be safeguarded against adversaries seeking to compromise or control them. The intelligence community must buy developing safe AI designs and in establishing requirements for "red teaming" and constant assessment to secure against potential dangers. These groups can utilize AI to mimic attacks, uncovering prospective weak points and establishing techniques to alleviate them. Proactive procedures, including partnership with allies on and financial investment in counter-AI innovations, will be vital.

THE NEW NORMAL

These difficulties can not be wished away. Waiting too wish for AI innovations to fully mature carries its own threats