U.S. Diplomacy
Since its starting in 1922, Foreign Affairs has been the leading online forum for severe discussion of American diplomacy and worldwide affairs. The magazine has included contributions from lots of leading international affairs specialists.

More Resources

- Feedback
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Gift a Subscription
- About Us
- Events
- Issue Archive
- Advertise
- Audio Content
- Account Management
- FAQs
Spy vs. AI

ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior functional roles in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, consisting of as its very first Chief Risk Officer.

- More by Anne Neuberger
Spy vs. AI

How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage

Anne Neuberger

-.
Copy Link Copied. Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-ai. Copy


Gift Link Copied. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Sign in.


Create Citation Copied. Chicago MLA APSA APA. Chicago Cite not available at the minute. MLA Cite not available at the minute. APSA Cite not available at the minute. APA Cite not available at the moment


Download PDF. This is a subscriber-only function. Subscribe now or Sign in.


Request Reprint. Request reprint authorizations here.




In the early 1950s, the United States faced a critical intelligence obstacle in its burgeoning competition with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance pictures from The second world war could no longer provide sufficient intelligence about Soviet military abilities, and thatswhathappened.wiki existing U.S. security abilities were no longer able to penetrate the Soviet Union's closed airspace. This deficiency stimulated an adventurous moonshot effort: the development of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In just a couple of years, U-2 missions were providing crucial intelligence, recording pictures of Soviet missile installations in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.

Today, the United States stands at a comparable point. Competition in between Washington and its rivals over the future of the global order is intensifying, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States should benefit from its world-class personal sector and adequate capability for innovation to outcompete its foes. The U.S. intelligence community need to harness the country's sources of strength to deliver insights to policymakers at the speed of today's world. The integration of synthetic intelligence, particularly through large language designs, offers groundbreaking chances to enhance intelligence operations and analysis, enabling the shipment of faster and more appropriate support to decisionmakers. This technological revolution includes significant downsides, however, particularly as enemies make use of comparable advancements to discover and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States should challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, first to secure itself from enemies who may utilize the innovation for ill, and initially to use AI in line with the laws and worths of a democracy.

For the U.S. national security neighborhood, satisfying the promise and handling the danger of AI will need deep technological and cultural changes and a desire to change the way agencies work. The U.S. intelligence and military communities can harness the potential of AI while alleviating its inherent risks, guaranteeing that the United States maintains its one-upmanship in a quickly evolving worldwide landscape. Even as it does so, the United States need to transparently convey to the American public, and to populations and partners all over the world, how the nation plans to fairly and securely use AI, in compliance with its laws and worths.

MORE, BETTER, FASTER

AI's potential to revolutionize the intelligence neighborhood lies in its capability to process and evaluate vast quantities of information at unmatched speeds. It can be challenging to evaluate big quantities of collected information to create time-sensitive warnings. U.S. intelligence services could take advantage of AI systems' pattern acknowledgment capabilities to identify and alert human experts to potential threats, such as rocket launches or military motions, or important worldwide advancements that experts know senior U.S. decisionmakers are interested in. This capability would guarantee that important cautions are timely, actionable, and relevant, enabling more reliable responses to both rapidly emerging threats and emerging policy chances. Multimodal designs, which integrate text, images, and audio, improve this analysis. For example, utilizing AI to cross-reference satellite images with signals intelligence might offer a detailed view of military motions, allowing much faster and more precise threat evaluations and possibly new methods of providing details to policymakers.

Intelligence analysts can likewise offload repeated and lengthy tasks to machines to concentrate on the most satisfying work: generating initial and deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence community's general insights and efficiency. A fine example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence firms invested early in AI-powered capabilities, and the bet has actually paid off. The capabilities of language models have grown progressively advanced and accurate-OpenAI's recently released o1 and o3 models demonstrated considerable progress in accuracy and reasoning ability-and can be used to even more quickly translate and sum up text, audio, and video files.

Although difficulties remain, future systems trained on greater quantities of non-English information could be efficient in critical subtle distinctions between dialects and comprehending the significance and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By counting on these tools, the intelligence neighborhood could focus on training a cadre of highly specialized linguists, who can be tough to discover, often struggle to make it through the clearance procedure, and take a long period of time to train. And naturally, by making more foreign language materials available across the best companies, U.S. intelligence services would have the ability to quicker triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they receive to select the needles in the haystack that actually matter.

The worth of such speed to policymakers can not be ignored. Models can swiftly sort through intelligence data sets, open-source details, and conventional human intelligence and produce draft summaries or preliminary analytical reports that analysts can then verify and fine-tune, ensuring the end products are both detailed and precise. Analysts might partner with an innovative AI assistant to resolve analytical problems, test ideas, and brainstorm in a collective fashion, enhancing each model of their analyses and delivering completed intelligence quicker.

Consider Israel's experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, discreetly broke into a secret Iranian facility and stole about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran's nuclear activities in between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli authorities, the Mossad gathered some 55,000 pages of files and a more 55,000 files saved on CDs, including pictures and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior authorities put tremendous pressure on intelligence professionals to produce detailed evaluations of its content and whether it indicated an ongoing effort to develop an Iranian bomb. But it took these specialists numerous months-and hundreds of hours of labor-to equate each page, review it by hand for relevant content, and include that details into evaluations. With today's AI capabilities, the very first 2 actions in that procedure could have been achieved within days, maybe even hours, permitting analysts to comprehend and contextualize the intelligence rapidly.

Among the most interesting applications is the method AI could transform how intelligence is taken in by policymakers, enabling them to communicate straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such capabilities would permit users to ask specific questions and receive summed up, pertinent details from thousands of reports with source citations, helping them make informed choices rapidly.

BRAVE NEW WORLD

Although AI offers various advantages, it also postures considerable brand-new risks, specifically as foes develop comparable innovations. China's developments in AI, especially in computer vision and surveillance, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the country is ruled by an authoritarian regime, it does not have privacy constraints and civil liberty protections. That deficit makes it possible for large-scale information collection practices that have actually yielded data sets of immense size. Government-sanctioned AI models are trained on vast amounts of individual and behavioral information that can then be used for different functions, such as monitoring and social control. The existence of Chinese business, such as Huawei, in telecoms systems and software around the globe could provide China with all set access to bulk information, notably bulk images that can be used to train facial recognition designs, a particular concern in nations with large U.S. military bases. The U.S. nationwide security neighborhood should think about how Chinese models constructed on such extensive information sets can provide China a tactical benefit.

And it is not just China. The expansion of "open source" AI designs, such as Meta's Llama and those produced by the French business Mistral AI and the Chinese business DeepSeek, is putting powerful AI capabilities into the hands of users throughout the world at fairly cost effective costs. A lot of these users are benign, but some are not-including authoritarian regimes, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign actors are using large language models to rapidly generate and spread incorrect and malicious content or to perform cyberattacks. As experienced with other intelligence-related technologies, such as signals intercept capabilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, and Russia will have every reward to share some of their AI developments with client states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary company, thereby increasing the threat to the United States and its allies.

The U.S. military and intelligence neighborhood's AI designs will become appealing targets for nerdgaming.science adversaries. As they grow more effective and main to U.S. national security decision-making, intelligence AIs will become vital nationwide possessions that should be safeguarded against enemies looking for to jeopardize or control them. The intelligence community must buy developing protected AI designs and in developing requirements for "red teaming" and constant assessment to secure against potential dangers. These teams can utilize AI to replicate attacks, coastalplainplants.org discovering possible weaknesses and establishing methods to reduce them. Proactive procedures, including collaboration with allies on and investment in counter-AI innovations, will be necessary.

THE NEW NORMAL

These difficulties can not be wanted away. Waiting too wish for AI technologies to fully mature brings its own risks