Our new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"
Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting
Share this post
Nobody can forecast the future however at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to give it its best shot. With as much as date news and a small however lively 14 Billion parameter model, our AI is boldly forecasting the unforeseeable. Join us as we try to address mankind's most difficult concerns.
Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, just as two years back, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain numerous pushing questions that are less easy to pin down. Our business, Lightning arrester Labs, has been mining questions from places like polymarket.com and training a large language design to be much better at predicting the future (and have actually seen some intriguing improvements - research paper incoming). Today we turned its cold, computing eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can provide us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.
For more updates from the AI world register for my newsletter!
Background
Our AI is a 14 billion criterion design which is in fact on the smaller side. (Some quotes recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION criteria and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from lots of months ago so we have actually developed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each question we supply the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unidentified territory to make its best forecast possible.
And Now ... The Important Questions
We postured the following concerns to our AI and determined its action. While we have seen prediction enhancements from our training, utilize these estimates for prop wagering at your own hazard.
Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?
AI Final Prediction: 5% possibility
And so it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, however a little too personal for gdprhub.eu a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta aspect in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposition ...
First, I'll look at the bottom lines from the articles. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor given that 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been helpful of his profession, attending his games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has even invited her and family to the Super Bowl, revealing her dedication.
Some fans are thrilled, while others, particularly Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly provided comments Travis made about Donald Trump going to the Super Bowl. That has caused some Swifties to question how appropriate Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship personal and not addressing the speculation straight.
I think the key points are the speculation and his evasive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an important event, the chances and his reactions recommend it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd approximate a low likelihood, possibly around 5%, thinking about all elements.
Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the extremely bowl?
AI Final Prediction: 79% opportunity
No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" move, now its simply a different front-tush being pushed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's comparable attempts? Appears like our AI thinks they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this video game.
Alright, I'm trying to figure out the probability that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I need to comprehend what exactly a "tush-push" is. From the articles, it appears like it's a strategy where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to push off protectors. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and method.
Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to execute the relocation. The short article discusses that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this method, which is pretty high. ... I likewise require to think of the defensive methods of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs are aware of the Eagles' "tush-push" method, they may adjust their defense appropriately, which could either increase or decrease the variety of times the Eagles utilize it.
Considering that more than five looks like a considerable number but possible provided their confidence, I would approximate a possibility around 60-70% opportunity. This represents their preparation, confidence in the technique, and the probability that they'll use it several times, specifically if it's reliable early on.
Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime program performance?
AI Final Prediction: 65% opportunity
While our AI might not be like us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling backward and forward, but in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to pull back from a battle.
From the posts, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration during a previous halftime show when Trump existed in 2018. That appears substantial because it reveals he's done it previously, so maybe he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more recent articles, it discusses that Lamar is moving away from political statements and focusing more on individual expression. That could suggest he's less likely to address Trump this time.
However, he's also included in a feud with Drake, which might provide him reasons to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal concerns surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a libel fit from Drake, so maybe he's careful about including any controversial songs in the efficiency. But given that he won the Grammys for that track, he may still wish to perform it, surgiteams.com even if it's uncertain.
Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile occasion, Lamar may feel obliged to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to prevent political statements throughout the halftime program, so there's a risk that such material may be limited or softened.
On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making vibrant carry on big phases. He's the very first solo rap act to headline the halftime show, which may offer him more imaginative liberty. Plus, his past habits recommends he's not shy about revealing his viewpoints, even in public efficiencies.
But I likewise remember reading that Lamar revealed tiredness about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might indicate he's less inspired to raise Trump this time around, especially if he's focusing on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, existing shifts in focus, legal concerns, and the event's context-the likelihood appears to be reasonably high, perhaps around 65%.
Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the extremely bowl?
AI Final Prediction: 25% possibility
Lets be honest, Andy Reid likes cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the truth that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh hamburger taint its forecast? Appears like theres somewhat of an opportunity that if the chiefs taste triumph, Andy will taste Angus Beef.
From the short articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't imply to trigger offense which he actually found it funny himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which may show he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.
Taking a look at the posts, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and loves cheeseburgers. There's an article particularly about his love for food, which recommends that he's a person who delights in eating, especially with his team. So, if there were strategies to celebrate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, especially if the circumstance is on screen for an event.
Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?
AI Final Prediction: 50% possibility
"Tails never ever fails?" You can't fool the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been predicting the coin toss and 53% are anticipating heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 super bowls. Potentially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be tricked and thinks anything can occur when that coin enters the air.
Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the probability that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, but there's some historic data that may affect this prediction.
First, I check out the short articles offered. They all mention the historical stats of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has shown up regularly than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the outcome 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a minor edge, but it's not a huge difference.
However, I bear in mind that the result of a coin toss is typically considered random. The slight historic edge for tails could be due to opportunity. But when making forecasts, in some cases individuals weigh historical information even if it's not statistically substantial. So, I must consider whether this historic bias needs to influence the probability.
After thinking about it, I decide that while the historic data reveals a small choice for tails, it's not statistically significant adequate to move the likelihood away from 0.5. So, I'll choose 0.5 as the possibility, acknowledging that the minor historic edge exists however doesn't override the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.
Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?
AI Final Prediction: 1% opportunity
We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I guarantee we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would most likely believe the very same. BUT, its authorities now because our AI says the possibilities are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still type of high when it pertains to scams on a nationwide scale). Appears like the Chiefs will need to win fair and square!
AI Reasoning:
Okay, so I'm trying to determine the probability that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a pretty major accusation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of posts that speak about conspiracy theories suggesting referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some doubtful hire current games, particularly the AFC National championship. That does appear to spark some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get annoyed when their team loses due to what they view as bad officiating.
But then I read that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "unbelievable" and "outrageous." They state there's no evidence of methodical predisposition. That's a strong statement from individuals in charge. If they're rejecting it, it may suggest there's no genuine basis or they would have addressed it in a different way if there was some reality to it.
Looking at the short articles, numerous sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise discussed that analytical analysis doesn't reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said data reveals the Chiefs have actually been punished more given that 2022. That's fascinating since if they were getting unique treatment, you might expect fewer penalties, right?
...
So, putting everything together, the likelihood that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably extremely low. Maybe not zero since you can't eliminate every possibility, however very unlikely.
Summary
There you have it everyone, is it even worth viewing the video game still? I guess I'll have to wait and see how the game ends up before we unleash this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a great video game! And hello, if it ends up our AI was incorrect about whatever, at least it can gain from this.
1
Our Brand new Deepseek based AI Says
duanealber541 edited this page 2025-02-28 16:42:36 +01:00