U.S. Foreign Policy
Since its founding in 1922, Foreign Affairs has been the leading forum for severe discussion of American diplomacy and worldwide affairs. The publication has actually included contributions from numerous leading global affairs professionals.

More Resources

- Feedback
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Gift a Subscription
- About Us
- Events
- Issue Archive
- Advertise
- Audio Content
- Account Management
- FAQs
Spy vs. AI

ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior operational roles in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, including as its first Chief Risk Officer.

- More by Anne Neuberger
Spy vs. AI

How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage

Anne Neuberger

-.
Copy Link Copied. Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-ai. Copy


Gift Link Copied. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Sign in.


Create Citation Copied. Chicago MLA APSA APA. Chicago Cite not available at the minute. MLA Cite not available at the moment. APSA Cite not available at the moment. APA Cite not available at the moment


Download PDF. This is a subscriber-only function. Subscribe now or Sign in.


Request Reprint. Request reprint approvals here.




In the early 1950s, the United States faced a critical intelligence obstacle in its growing competition with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance pictures from World War II could no longer provide adequate intelligence about Soviet military capabilities, and existing U.S. surveillance abilities were no longer able to penetrate the Soviet Union's closed airspace. This deficiency spurred an adventurous moonshot initiative: the development of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In just a couple of years, U-2 missions were delivering vital intelligence, recording pictures of Soviet missile installations in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.

Today, the United States stands at a similar juncture. Competition in between Washington and its competitors over the future of the global order is heightening, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States need to make the most of its first-rate private sector and adequate capability for innovation to outcompete its adversaries. The U.S. intelligence community should harness the country's sources of strength to provide insights to policymakers at the speed these days's world. The integration of synthetic intelligence, particularly through big language designs, provides groundbreaking chances to improve intelligence operations and analysis, enabling the delivery of faster and more pertinent support to decisionmakers. This technological revolution comes with substantial downsides, however, especially as foes exploit similar developments to uncover and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States need to challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, initially to secure itself from enemies who may utilize the innovation for ill, and first to use AI in line with the laws and values of a democracy.

For the U.S. national security neighborhood, satisfying the guarantee and managing the hazard of AI will require deep technological and cultural modifications and a willingness to change the method firms work. The U.S. intelligence and military communities can harness the potential of AI while mitigating its inherent risks, guaranteeing that the United States maintains its one-upmanship in a quickly evolving worldwide landscape. Even as it does so, the United States need to transparently convey to the American public, and to populations and partners worldwide, how the nation intends to fairly and securely use AI, in compliance with its laws and values.

MORE, BETTER, FASTER

AI's potential to change the intelligence community depends on its capability to procedure and analyze large amounts of information at unprecedented speeds. It can be challenging to analyze big amounts of gathered data to produce time-sensitive cautions. U.S. intelligence services might leverage AI systems' pattern recognition capabilities to recognize and alert human experts to possible threats, such as rocket launches or military motions, or crucial global advancements that experts know senior U.S. decisionmakers are interested in. This capability would guarantee that important warnings are prompt, actionable, and pertinent, enabling for more reliable actions to both quickly emerging dangers and emerging policy opportunities. Multimodal designs, which integrate text, images, and audio, boost this analysis. For example, utilizing AI to cross-reference satellite images with signals intelligence might supply a detailed view of military movements, allowing much faster and more precise risk evaluations and potentially brand-new ways of providing details to policymakers.

Intelligence experts can also offload repetitive and time-consuming jobs to devices to concentrate on the most fulfilling work: creating initial and deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence neighborhood's general insights and performance. A fine example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence firms invested early in AI-powered capabilities, and the bet has actually paid off. The capabilities of language models have actually grown progressively sophisticated and accurate-OpenAI's recently released o1 and o3 designs showed significant progress in precision and thinking ability-and can be used to even more rapidly equate and summarize text, audio, and video files.

Although challenges remain, future systems trained on higher amounts of information might be efficient in discerning subtle differences in between dialects and understanding the significance and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By counting on these tools, the intelligence neighborhood could focus on training a cadre of extremely specialized linguists, who can be tough to discover, frequently battle to get through the clearance process, and take a long time to train. And of course, by making more foreign language materials available across the best agencies, U.S. intelligence services would be able to more quickly triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they get to pick out the needles in the haystack that truly matter.

The value of such speed to policymakers can not be ignored. Models can swiftly sort through intelligence data sets, open-source details, and conventional human intelligence and produce draft summaries or preliminary analytical reports that analysts can then validate and refine, ensuring the final products are both detailed and precise. Analysts could partner with an innovative AI assistant to resolve analytical issues, test ideas, and brainstorm in a collaborative style, improving each model of their analyses and providing finished intelligence quicker.

Consider Israel's experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, covertly broke into a secret Iranian center and took about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran's nuclear activities in between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli officials, the Mossad gathered some 55,000 pages of files and a more 55,000 files saved on CDs, including photos and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior officials positioned immense pressure on intelligence experts to produce detailed evaluations of its content and whether it pointed to an ongoing effort to build an Iranian bomb. But it took these professionals several months-and hundreds of hours of labor-to translate each page, evaluate it by hand for botdb.win pertinent material, and include that details into evaluations. With today's AI abilities, the very first 2 steps in that process could have been accomplished within days, perhaps even hours, enabling analysts to understand and contextualize the intelligence rapidly.

Among the most intriguing applications is the method AI could transform how intelligence is consumed by policymakers, enabling them to communicate straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such capabilities would permit users to ask particular questions and receive summed up, relevant details from thousands of reports with source citations, helping them make informed choices rapidly.

BRAVE NEW WORLD

Although AI provides numerous benefits, it likewise poses considerable brand-new dangers, especially as enemies develop similar technologies. China's developments in AI, especially in computer system vision and monitoring, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the country is ruled by an authoritarian regime, it does not have privacy constraints and civil liberty defenses. That deficit makes it possible for massive data collection practices that have yielded data sets of tremendous size. Government-sanctioned AI designs are trained on huge quantities of personal and behavioral information that can then be utilized for various purposes, such as security and social control. The existence of Chinese companies, such as Huawei, in telecommunications systems and software around the globe might supply China with all set access to bulk information, significantly bulk images that can be utilized to train facial acknowledgment designs, a specific concern in nations with big U.S. military bases. The U.S. national security community need to think about how Chinese models constructed on such substantial data sets can provide China a tactical advantage.

And it is not just China. The expansion of "open source" AI models, such as Meta's Llama and those produced by the French business Mistral AI and the Chinese business DeepSeek, is putting powerful AI abilities into the hands of users around the world at fairly cost effective expenses. Many of these users are benign, but some are not-including authoritarian routines, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign actors are using big language designs to rapidly create and spread out false and destructive content or to carry out cyberattacks. As experienced with other intelligence-related technologies, such as signals obstruct capabilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, and Russia will have every reward to share a few of their AI advancements with customer states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary business, therefore increasing the threat to the United States and its allies.

The U.S. military and intelligence community's AI models will become attractive targets for adversaries. As they grow more powerful and main to U.S. national security decision-making, intelligence AIs will end up being important nationwide possessions that should be defended against enemies looking for to jeopardize or control them. The intelligence community should purchase developing safe and secure AI models and in establishing standards for "red teaming" and constant assessment to safeguard against potential threats. These teams can utilize AI to imitate attacks, revealing potential weaknesses and establishing strategies to alleviate them. Proactive procedures, consisting of partnership with allies on and financial investment in counter-AI technologies, will be important.

THE NEW NORMAL

These difficulties can not be wanted away. Waiting too long for AI technologies to fully mature carries its own risks